curiosity

Comparison · Coding agents

Curiosity and Claude Code
Different jobs, used together

Claude Code writes the code from your terminal; Curiosity is the platform the tool runs on.

Their deployment Your machine, Anthropic’s cloud, or your runners Their data model Files in your repository Our deployment Cloud or your own servers Our residency EU, or your own

Your data · your environment

Who each tool is for

Different problems, honestly stated

Curiosity

For industrial and regulated teams whose knowledge sits in engineering systems and structured records, where the answer depends on how those records connect, and where the deployment has to run on their own infrastructure.

Claude Code

Anthropic’s coding agent. It reads a codebase, edits files, runs commands and works with git, in the terminal, the IDE, a desktop app, the web and CI. It suits developers who want an agent that plans and ships changes, with detailed permission rules and skills, hooks, MCP and an SDK to extend it.

How Curiosity compares

Where the boundary falls

Claude Code is not an alternative to Curiosity, and teams use both. It writes code well. What it does not bring is the system the code runs on: records connected and kept current, permissions per record, sign in, an audit trail and somewhere to host it. Curiosity is that system, and through curio Claude Code builds on it.

The platform the code runs on

A coding agent writes code. An enterprise app also needs its data connected and kept current, a data model, search, sign in and hosting. Curiosity ships those, so the agent writes the part that is yours.

Permissions the code cannot forget

Code an agent writes checks access only where it remembers to. In Curiosity, access is synced from the source systems and applied per record, so a tool built on it inherits what each user may see.

A change a person approves

Through curio the agent works in Sudo’s sandbox: it edits, builds against the workspace and stages a commit. Nothing runs until a person approves the diff.

Keep the agent you have

curio is a command line, so any coding agent that can run a shell command can work on your workspace. Your developers keep their tools; the platform keeps its rules.

Out of the box

What an enterprise app needs before its first screen

Claude Code can write each of these. Then your team owns it: keeps the connectors current as the source systems change, and shows an auditor that every screen checks access. In Curiosity they come with the platform.

QuestionCuriosityClaude Code alone

Data from your systems

70+ systems connected, kept in sync

Connectors the agent writes and your team runs

A data model

A typed graph of records and their links

A schema the agent designs for each app

Search

Keyword, semantic and hybrid search in one query

A search stack to choose, host and tune

Permissions

Synced from each source, applied per record

Access checks the code has to remember

Sign in

SSO through Google, Microsoft, Okta, Auth0 or SAML2

An identity integration for each app

Audit trail

User actions, downloads and AI interactions logged

Logging the agent adds when someone asks

Change control

Every change a diff a person approves

Your repository’s pull request review

Hosting

Your servers or private cloud, with replicas and backups

Infrastructure your team builds and runs

Use them together · curio

Claude Code writes it. Sudo checks it. You approve it.

curio is Curiosity’s command line. It gives Claude Code a session on your workspace: Sudo’s skills to read, a sandbox to edit in, and a build that checks the change against the workspace. The agent never gets more than that session.

  1. 01

    Install curio

    One command on the machine where Claude Code runs, then sign in to your workspace in the browser.

  2. 02

    Give Claude Code the skill

    curio skills install puts one skill in .claude/skills for this project. Add the global flag for every project on the machine.

  3. 03

    Approve what it builds

    The agent edits and builds in a session, and stages a commit. A person approves it on Sudo’s review screen, and only then does the workspace run it.

Terminal
 curl -fsSL https://curiosity.sh/install.sh | bash
 curio login --server https://studio.example.com
 curio skills install

Sign curio in without the approve right, the default, and approval stays with a person whatever the agent does.

Side by side

Feature comparison

The same five questions, answered for both.

QuestionCuriosityClaude Code

Deployment

Cloud or self-hosted, ready to use

Your machine, Anthropic’s cloud, or your runners

Data model

Managed context layer and knowledge graph

Files in your repository

Industrial fit

Built for industrial and enterprise teams

Developers and software teams

Data reach

70+ systems connected, and yours through a connector you write

Local files, shell, MCP servers, the web

Residency

EU hosted, or entirely your own infrastructure

Anthropic, or Claude in AWS, Google Cloud or Azure

Customization

What your team can change

Your own code, interface, data model and configuration. Claude Code as its own documentation described it in October 2026. Where it says Not available, the vendor documents no such capability.

QuestionCuriosityClaude Code

Your own code

C# endpoints, AI tools and tasks, compiled in Studio

Writes and runs any code your shell runs

Your own interface

Your own front end in C#, deployed from git

Writes interface code, does not host it

Data model

Typed node and edge schemas you define

Not available, works on your files

Configuration as code

Every change committed to git, pushed to your remote

CLAUDE.md, settings, skills, hooks, MCP config in git

APIs and SDKs

REST API, C# and Python library, connector SDK

Agent SDK, headless mode, GitHub Actions, MCP server

AI integration

What AI can build and reach

Whether AI can build on it, who reviews the result, and which models it runs. Claude Code as its own documentation described it in October 2026.

QuestionCuriosityClaude Code

AI that builds

Sudo drafts endpoints, tools, schemas and screens

Plans, edits files, runs commands, opens pull requests

Review before it applies

Every change a diff a person approves, in a sandbox

Permission prompts, plan mode, optional sandbox, PR review

Model choice

Any major provider, or an OpenAI compatible endpoint

Claude only, via Anthropic, AWS, Google or Azure

Models on your servers

Open weights on your servers, or air gapped

Not available, Claude models only

Assistant permissions

Built in tools search as the user, per record

Your own credentials, scoped by permission rules

Agent protocols

MCP server and an OpenAI compatible API

MCP client and MCP server

Which to use

When each is the right choice

Building on Curiosity does not mean giving up Claude Code. The question is what it builds on.

Claude Code alone

  • You are changing a codebase with a person at the terminal.
  • The application already has its data, sign in and hosting.
  • The tool reads one system, or none.
  • It is a prototype, not a tool people run on production records.

Claude Code on Curiosity

  • The tool needs records from several systems, kept current.
  • Each user may see only what the source systems show them, per record.
  • It runs on your infrastructure, with SSO and an audit trail.
  • You want every change built, reviewed and approved before it runs.
At Airbus, we developed the next generation of customer support AI assistance tools with Curiosity, enhancing our technical support’s ability to access and navigate vast data from multiple sources, including millions of documents.

Services Innovation Team

Airline Services at Airbus

Your data. Your infrastructure.

Build on it with the agent you have