curiosity

Use case

Stop starting
from scratch

Engineering teams spend a surprising share of their time rebuilding context that already exists, because the chain from requirement to evidence runs through four disconnected tools.

  1. Source 01 Requirements
  2. Source 02 Designs and CAD
  3. Source 03 Analyses and tests
  4. Source 04 Change records

The problem

The chain exists. It is just not connected anywhere.

A requirement leads to a design, which leads to an analysis, which leads to test evidence, which leads to a change record. Every link is real and every link is in a different system, so following the chain is manual work somebody redoes each time.

An example question, answered from four connected sources Asked: Which tests verify requirement REQ-0412, and are they current? Answer: Two tests cover it. One predates change ECO-88 and needs a re-run against the revised bracket design. Sources: REQ-0412 (requirements), Bracket assembly, rev D (designs and cad), Vibration test VT-31 (analyses and tests), ECO-88 (change records). Which tests verify requirement REQ-0412, and are they current?| STUDIO EXAMPLE Two tests cover it. One predates change ECO-88 and needs a re-runagainst the revised bracket design. SOURCES REQUIREMENTS REQ-0412 DESIGNS AND CAD Bracket assembly, rev D ANALYSES AND TESTS Vibration test VT-31 CHANGE RECORDS ECO-88
An example question, answered from four connected sources Asked: Which tests verify requirement REQ-0412, and are they current? Answer: Two tests cover it. One predates change ECO-88 and needs a re-run against the revised bracket design. Sources: REQ-0412 (requirements), Bracket assembly, rev D (designs and cad), Vibration test VT-31 (analyses and tests), ECO-88 (change records). Which tests verify requirement REQ-0412,and are they current?| STUDIO EXAMPLE Two tests cover it. One predates changeECO-88 and needs a re-run against therevised bracket design. SOURCES REQUIREMENTS REQ-0412 DESIGNS AND CAD Bracket assembly, rev D ANALYSES AND TESTS Vibration test VT-31 CHANGE RECORDS ECO-88

What changes

Across requirements, design and verification

01

Find what the organization knows

Ask about a component or a past decision and get answers grounded in the actual engineering record.

02

Follow requirements to evidence

From source through design and analysis to test evidence, without rebuilding the chain by hand.

03

Know what a change touches

See the downstream impact before you make the change, not in the review that catches it.

In practice

Reuse, rather than rediscovery

The expensive failure in engineering knowledge is solving a problem that was already solved on another program.

  1. 01

    Work across programs

    Prior work found without knowing which project it belonged to or which archive holds it.

  2. 02

    Keep rationale

    Trade studies and design decisions stay searchable after the engineers who made them leave.

  3. 03

    Variants and generations

    What changed between two versions, and why, answered from the records rather than from memory.

Security

Built for security

Made in Germany and built for data sovereignty. Your data stays in your environment, encrypted and access controlled down to the individual record.

On premises or private cloud

Deploy on your own infrastructure or in certified data centers in Europe.

Single sign on and enforced MFA

Access synced to your data sources with relationship based permissions.

Full audit trail

Every query, download and data access logged.

Data residency

Your data stays in the region you choose.

Made in Germany

Built in Munich.

GDPR compliant

European data protection standards.

Your data. Your infrastructure.

Stop starting from scratch